The Impact of Digitalization on Statutory Auditing in Serbia
Jelena Gruslav
jelena.gruslav.23@singimail.rs
Miroslav Perić
Goranka Knežević
Journal Information
Journal
The European Journal of Applied Economics
Volume / Issue
Vol. 23, No. 1 (2026)
Pages
76–101
Published
09 December 2025
DOI
10.5937/EJAE23-57134
Abstract
Digitalization is profoundly transforming audit operations in Serbia, significantly enhancing the efficiency, accuracy, and speed of audit processes. This paper investigates how the adoption of digital tools and technologies is reshaping traditional audit methodologies. Key advancements include the integration of data analytics, automated systems, and blockchain technology, which collectively revolutionize the way auditors conduct reviews and assessments. The digital shift is not merely about adopting new tools; it fundamentally alters the skill sets required for today's auditors. Professionals must now navigate complex digital environments, develop competencies in data interpretation, and harness analytical tools to derive meaningful insights from vast amounts of information. Emerging challenges, such as cybersecurity threats, also require auditors to remain vigilant and responsive in safeguarding sensitive data. While digitalization offers substantial benefits, including increased data precision, enhanced reporting capabilities, and streamlined workflows, it also necessitates significant adaptation. Firms must invest in innovative technologies, upgrade their infrastructure, and prioritize ongoing skill development to leverage these advancements effectively. This strategic focus will enable audit firms to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving landscape while addressing the multifaceted challenges of the digital age. Ultimately, embracing digitalization is crucial for enhancing the value and effectiveness of audit services in Serbia.
Keywords
Citation
Jelena Gruslav, Miroslav Perić, Goranka Knežević (2026). The Impact of Digitalization on Statutory Auditing in Serbia The European Journal of Applied Economics. 23(1) 76–101. DOI: 10.5937/EJAE23-57134
